- Frank Kinniry, a principal in the Vanguard Investment Strategy Group, discusses why it is important to understand the details of an investment rather than simply painting an entire category with the same brush.
- The line between so-called active investments and so-called passive investments has blurred. Hundreds of ETFs and “smart beta” funds have come to market in recent years. While many ETFs are traditional market-capitalization weighted index funds, many (including so-called smart beta funds) are not.
- The author believes much of the above may be occurring in order to “cloak higher-cost actively managed offerings under the secularly trendy banner of indexing.”
- He believes low-cost actively-managed funds can outperform the average index fund. In turn, he believes that it can be better “by far” to invest in a low-cost active fund when compared to a high-cost index fund or ETF.
- In summary, he states that it is overly simplistic to say that “indexing outperforms active management,” or that index funds are “low-cost” or “broadly diversified.”
- Investors (individual investors and financial representatives alike) need to do their homework. The search for a simple answer by applying generalities is commonly a fool’s errand.
- We completely agree that many ETF’s and smart beta products are misunderstood, and in turn, typically masquerade as low-cost passive investments.
- We also agree that a key criterion for all investments, active or passive, is the direct (expense ratio) and indirect cost (turnover/trading costs) of the strategy. The lower the cost of the strategy, the less ground the active manager has to “make up” relative to its target benchmark.
- We utilize actively-managed and passively-managed investment products in client portfolios at Entasis. Read more about Our Process to understand our use of each.